Dating help

I discovered this in a bag of vintage clothes I bought a long time ago that all needed repair. It was in a ball and I admit I never looked at it. Today I have looked at it and realised it may be older than I realised. I've researched the label and discovered lots about scarves. Can anyone tell me more?

 

Hi there, I went ahead and rotated your photos for you so everyone could see them the right way. This looks like it dates to the later 40s to me. Let's see what others have to say and if they know more about the maker other than that they made scarves.






Button hole below

 

Thank you so much.

 

Maybe one of our UK sellers will chime in.

 

I would be astounded if it was from the 70s or 80s. The stitches work is nothing like anything I have from those eras

 

I am so intrigued to learn more about this and the brand. I had not heard of this brand and it's interesting how the information that comes up when doing a general search from what I've seen scarves.

In my general search I did see this Jacqmar scarf thread but we had here in 2012.
http://forums.vintagefashionguild.org/threads/jacqmar-scarf-knowledge-needed.45265/

 

I found loads on scarves but there is a Jacqmar dress in the Victoria & Albert museum, London.

 

I found a few Jacqmar clothing pieces. None of which have your exact label but one of them is closer than the others.

This label is listed to be for a 50s skirt on Etsy however I think it's likely to be from the 60s;
label:

Listing:

Code:

https://www.etsy.com/listing/453639808/vintage-womens-skirt-jacqmar-designer?ref=market

This label is listed to be for an 80s blazer on Etsy. It's really blurry. I am sorry.


Listing:

Code:

https://www.etsy.com/listing/242381673/vintage-cardigan-jacket-80s-by-jacqmar?ref=market

This one is not dated but is a Jacqmar jacket on eBay and it shows the construction inside:

Listing:

Code:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Ladies-Jacqmar-Jacket-Size-10-NWT-/222168991980?hash=item33ba4dc8ec:m:mTwmQOSBVfue8FIs1i4tFwg

 

Can you show us the details of the upper sleeves and underarm area, please? In the early photo the upper arms and underarms look rather tight to the body, giving it a more 1950s style. In the later photos the underarms and upper sleeves look looser which could indicate a 1980s dress. Can you show the inside of the shoulders, do you think there were ever any shoulder pads in there?

I get a general "80 does 50s" sense from this. Although the seam allowance seems wide for the 1980s. Unless that is a style of the maker.

 

My feeling... the label looks late 70s... the fabric though looks like a late 50s man-made fabric that was very popular in the US for mens and little boys jackets... the style is very 50s looking to me... but I wonder why such a fancy store (there's a blog from the Museum of London about its history!) wouldn't fully line the jacket. Even a spring/summer weight jacket would have a light lining not this partial lining. I'm confused by that.

I think it's a revival piece... late 70s-1980. At this time, not holding it myself etc. Curious to follow this thread. Thanks for the lessons!

 

I think this is 1950's and the lining was damaged and removed. The label doesn't look like it was originally attached like that so was probably salvaged from the lining. I see New Look period most definitely. That wonderful seaming would look great when properly presented over a full skirted dress/petticoats. (I even wondered if this is a coat/dress?)

 

We do have a 50s Victor Steibel at Jacqmar label in our label resource section. It looks like he was designing there from 46-58.

http://vintagefashionguild.org/label-resource/stiebel-victor/

 

I had seen that and when I clicked on it, there was a link that said poppy on RL but it said it was no longer available and I wondered if that was you.

 

The arms are tight and three quarter length. The shoulders are narrow. No shoulder pads have been used. The lining as such is hemmed with tiny hand stitches. When put on it nips in at the waist and then the skirt is very full and below the knees. Definitely the new look look

 

The shape of that collar does not look 70s or 80s at all to me, nor does the interior construction. I would've said it was late 40s or early 50s and it looks like it could've been a coat, and maybe even shortened at some point.