1940s Harlene Original Dress - Worth Getting Fixed?

I picked up this dress which I believe dates to the 1940s. I found a dress by this maker sold by Christies referred to as a couture label (however, I have no idea). As you can see the dress has some issues and needs repair work. I have an expert tailor but I am just trying to decide if it is worth getting fixed. There are no rips at random spots on the dress only to the seamwork - does that help in making the repair easier? Would I be better off selling as is and marketing to a vintage seamstress? Trying to figure out if I can recoup what I think could be a decent investment in fixing in the sale price. I realize you can't provide pricing advice but I am more just wondering in general if you have thoughts on whether worth it or not.

Am I right on 40s?

I love this dress and would be a shame to toss aside. My investment to date is very very very minimal.

Thank you all!
Maureen

100_2287.jpg


labele.jpg


zipper.jpg


bodice.jpg
 
This reminds me of being a girl guide, on a summer camp in the 1980s (bear with me here). We were putting a final evening 'on stage performance' on in the village hall (village in middle of nowhere, untouched since c. 1955).

There was... groan if you recognize this... a box of 'dress-up' clothes to assist us. As I was playing an older woman, I put on a long velvet dress, and my hair in a bun. We did a few dress rehearsals, and I kept stepping on the hem. By the final performance, after I rushed off the stage and stamped on the hem again, there was a gaping hole just to the side along the seams.

I wince inwardly when I wonder now how old that dress was. I fear it was 1930s.

I have nothing of substance to add here, apart from, I agree roughly with the date, I wonder whether the 'New York Creation' label suggests that it was ready made (I may be wrong, but I'd thought the label was adopted by ready-made dress manufacturers), is that a newer nylon zipper? and yes, please do restore it. I suspect you may be restoring the mischief of some hem-stamping vandal like me...
 
whoops - didnt realize it was a link. i had looked up the ILGWU part but didnt realize the New York Creation was significant. Thank you so much for pointing out - I can now say I learned something new today.

Thanks!
 
:USETHUMBUP:

We aim to please!
Also, I didnt mean to suggest that your Harlenes label is insignificant. I just dont know anything about that label. I would certainly mention both when selling. The NYC label is more recognized probably.

It is a lovely dress and worth saving!
 
The zipper is def metal - fairly substantial - but is covered in a black material. At first I was thrown until I started to unzip. Zipper has writing on front which I am struggling with KOH something and then looks like the word Lovers down other side on front. Back has two patent #s which I am going to look up after lunch.
 
Brenda,

I didn't take it that way at all - for all I know Harlene sat in her basement and sewed her name into things that she didn't make! LOL I am just glad to have learned about the NY label.

Thanks again!
Maureen
 
I think the zipper might be Koverin. I have been helping at the U of H Historic Costume Collection and have come across two zippers with that label on them in late '30's dresses.

Linn
 
If the damage is only at the seams, it shouldn't be a difficult repair job, although it might be time consuming. I agree the NYC label is quite significant. If your initial investment isn't very much, I'd definitely take it to your seamstress and at least have a quote on the work. And make sure the rest of the fabric is sturdy. I'd, myself, have it done unless the cost is outrageous!
 
Back
Top