A dress, a book and magazine cover, and a good story! - photos added

Pinkcoke

Alumni
to tell the whole story; I was browsing books in a second hand shop when I saw the cover of Margaret Atwoods' The Blind Assassin: (published in 2000, story within a story set in the 1930s)
Novel_the_blind_assassin_cover.jpg

The dress pictured is very similar to an unlabelled one I bought about 6 months ago, and just knew was 1930's but had nothing to say so, I also wondered if the arm triangles were meant to fold down or stand up and now I know! Mine is black velvet and not backless (I wonder would this place it earlier or later than the one above?), it has larger white silk triangles, also folded over, at the front and back around a square neckline, as well as on the sleeves. Intrigued as to where the cover came from, I discovered it is mostly unattributed, but this very helpful interview with the author tells all. Of course, they got it from an image archive, but it was actually a portrait painting of a lady called Clara Voorhees featured on the cover of The Saturday Evening Post 13 Oct 1934 by Charles W Dennis.
193725221441527448_7xsAaHCA_c.jpg

It turns out Clara modelled for Charles Dennis for several SEP cover paintings and at one point they were engaged to be married. Apparantly it didn't conclude however, as this discussion thread suggests, where the daughter of Charles Dennis, and granddaughter of Clara Vorhees have found each other in their seperate quests for research!
Finally I come round to the point, there is apparantly a small article in said magazine about the model, so should anybody happen to have a copy, I would very much like to read that part!
 
Will do, it's currently on my mannequin, but it doesn't work terrifically without arms, as you can imagine, so I may try to get somebody from rehearsal tomorrow evening to model it for me but it will dark :( It's starting to get dim at 2:30pm here at the moment!
 
Looking forward to seeing your dress, Melanie! What are you rehearsing?

I've been complaining (not really) because the sun is setting at about 5:50 (5:49 today) but it's still light until just before it sets and then it's pretty dark within a few minutes. 2:30 is early for the light to fade... The good news is that in a little less than a month the days will start getting longer again! We still have eleven hours of daylight - which is a lot more than in other parts of the world -but we never have the long, long summer days that you get in more nothern latitudes.

Linn
 
Verdi's Macbeth - horror opera is unbelieveably tuneful - possibly my favourite yet, I wouldn't bother watching the video but have a listen. and fingers crossed, I have a second audition for Dama (Lady in waiting) tomorrow as well :) Macbeth is hardly ever produced because it requires a large chorus - fortunately our group is known for this so it's going to be an exciting performance.

It's dark all the time at the moment here, mostly because the rain clouds racing across the sky today never break to let the sun through *sigh*. I haven't been able to photograph anything for days, there is approximately 1 hour at about 10:30am where the light is OK, but it's still showing up as dusky in my results compared to last month.
I just checked, sunset was oficially 4pm here today :puzzled:
 
I have seen Verdi's Macbeth - about 10-11 years ago HOT (Hawaii Opera Theatre) did it. We have a large volunteer chorus.

Since a 4:00 sunset sounded really early to me, I just looked up the range for Hawaii and discovered that we are very close to the date for the "earliest" sunset which will occur on November 25th. It will set at 5:48. The latest sunset is at 7:16 - so while we have more daylight most of the year we never get those wonderful long summer nights that you get. The lattitude here is 21.6.

Sorry to be so OT - and look forward to seeing your dress. Very interesting about the magazine and book covers!

Best of luck with your audition - hope you get the role of Dama!

Linn
 
no worries, I am interested by these things too Linn, one of my best experiences was visiting Norway for my Godbrother's confirmation and going fishing at 11pm (in broad daylight) in a small rowing boat in the fjords. All we had were loose lines with several unbaited hooks on we dunked over side, wiggled a bit and came back with heaps of mackrell - we cooked them on a BBQ right there on the beach - it has to be one of the best meals I remember!
and how's this for serendipity; said Godbrother trained as a commercial pilot and the first position he got was here at the East Midlands Airport in England! We were over the moon to see him more often - we are very close as our parents were best friends for many years but his parents and an older sister tragically died in a car/train crash when he was very young. He has another sister who has also come to England though.
 
As an aside... I just read a funny bit in a Canadian paper today about Margaret Atwood:
The queen of CanLit bestrides the literary world like a colossus. There is no such thing as a bad review of a Margaret Atwood book in Canada. That’s too bad, because many of her books are tedious and unreadable, full of tortuous plots and unpleasant characters. Why will no one say so? Because we’re grateful that she’s put us on the global map. And because if they do, they’ll never work in this country again.
 
I did read an *extremely* serious review which mentioned it was a few 'story within a story's' too many and I have to admit, that's something I detest in a novel (particularly those that flick between present day and decades ago). However I've never read any of her books and bought the above because it happened to be a first edition and if nothing else will look pretty on my shelf!
 
The queen of CanLit bestrides the literary world like a colossus. There is no such thing as a bad review of a Margaret Atwood book in Canada. That’s too bad, because many of her books are tedious and unreadable, full of tortuous plots and unpleasant characters. Why will no one say so? Because we’re grateful that she’s put us on the global map. And because if they do, they’ll never work in this country again.

Whoa! I used to be a big Margaret Atwood fan in graduate school (in fact, I pitched doing a thesis about her to my adviser, but he discouraged the idea). I really loved her poetry. I've only read a few of her novels, though.

Great sleuthing, Melanie! It must have been very satisfying, indeed, finding out at last what to do with the arm triangles...

I look forward to pics of your dress!
 
Sorry for the delay my friend wasn't there last week, it turned out to be a little large for her, however you still need to be about her size to get into it! I hadn't expected it to be full length either, but as you can see the proportions are good for her height. The back may also be considered backless now? or just a deep V back? Apologies the lighting was awful so you can only see the bias cut on the last photo of the back.
DSCF4856.jpg
DSCF4855.jpg
DSCF4861.jpg
DSCF4860.jpg
 
What a gorgeous dress! Thank you for showing it to us. I would not consider it backless - it's not low enough; just a deep-V. Does it fit you? If so you should defintely keep it. I can see this with fantastic 1930's jewelry!

Linn
 
you're welcome Linn, I love putting the pieces of the puzzle together!
Unfortunately no it does not fit - I did try it on but I am too tall by far and it needs slimmer shoulders than mine ideally. Although I would love a black dress like this - V necks suit me well so I may possibly make a pattern from it before it sells.
 
Back
Top