Are These Shoes Really from 1962

I have these vintage shoes and what might be the original receipt. The receipt is dated 1962 and describes silver sandals. Now the shoes look more 40s to me, definitely not 60s. However could these really be from 1962? Maybe a style for an older lady? Maybe the receipt is really for something else or maybe they were sold used in 62? Any help appreciated! DSC_0361.JPG DSC_0364.JPG DSC_0365.JPG DSC_0366.JPG DSC_0367.JPG
 
I can believe they were sold new in 1962 - they appear to have lurex strands woven into the fabric, the uppers look to be made of all man made materials which is the way footwear is going in the 60's. Sandals seem to change in style slower than other footwear I think because the open toe doesn't allow you to see the toe shape which is one of the main changes in footwear fashion. At this point in time most ladies shoes have sharply pointed toes, which isn't possible to produce in a traditional sandal, especially one suited for the conservative.
 
Oh my gooodness. I have some shoes that are very similar to these. I don't know the exact year they were made but they are from the 60s;

shoes.jpg
 
I would have said 1952 not 1962, but they might also be designed for ballroom dancing and those styles don't follow the fashionable trends as much.
 
Please forgive my error in my last response. It was a typo and I meant to enter that mine were from the 50s, not the 60s.
I don't know dating of shoes very well but mine were sold to me as being from the 50s.
I do also know that lurex was introduced in 1946 so these shoes could have been made anytime after.
I tried to search newspaper archives and saw lurex featured in clothing a lot in ads from the mid 50s through the 60s and in some shoes too but could not find a shoe example like the ones posted or mine.
 
I will take some photos of some later 60's sandals I have made of the same silver (foil?) material with man made linings.
I looked through all my adverts and it's really hard to find any sandals advertised around this time. The only thing I did find was an advert from the same year as the receipt apparantly showing the same mesh fabric:
Selby 1962 Mar Physical Culture Colina shoe widths.JPG


Can you show the label and inside markings please? We might be able to deduce more knowing what sort of company produced them.
 
I would think the fabric is less important than the shape of the shoe. The Cuban heel and overall shape of the shoe looks 40s to early 50s to me. My mother had the same type of silver mesh dance shoes, she kept the receipt too and hers were Christmas, 1938! I know the silver Lurex mesh was used in the late 30s already.
 
Could lurex mesh have been something different than the trademarked lurex? I show the first use in commerce being in 1945, the registration date was in 1946, and on Lurex's website they say Lurex was first introduced in 1946.

Screen Shot 2015-02-24 at 2.27.52 PM.png

Code:
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:hv5u8e.2.8

Screen Shot 2015-02-24 at 2.25.41 PM.png

Code:
http://www.lurex.com/since
 
I would think the fabric is less important than the shape of the shoe. The Cuban heel and overall shape of the shoe looks 40s to early 50s to me. My mother had the same type of silver mesh dance shoes, she kept the receipt too and hers were Christmas, 1938! I know the silver Lurex mesh was used in the late 30s already.
I would have to disagree there, as like most things in fashion, the same shapes come around again and again over the years, but the materials and construction tend to evolve and develop. It is true you can find this shape of sandal in the 1930s, but I still bought this same style of sandals around 2012. Your 1930s sandals are likely to be all leather apart from the mesh. These are leather soled, with man made uppers. My modern sandals are leather uppers with man made soles.

I'd also like to mention the buckle on these shoes is a streamlined rectangular buckle with a roller tube. Most sandals I've handled from the 40's and 50's have figure of 8 buckles without the roller tube.
The size and manufacturer's markings are stamped, not hand written. There is no set date when this habit changed, it varies by company, but it does indicate later rather than earlier for me.
Lastly the chunkier heel is likely to be due to the shoe size - 10 N - if I'm reading it correctly. As an evening/possible dance shoe as Jonathan mentions, most tall ladies do not want to tower over their partners and as such the larger shoes for this purpose tend to have lower thicker heels. I have several pairs of my own that do not strictly follow the fashion of their era for this necessity.

I do have this pair of sandals from the early to mid 60's, and they share similar features, such as the buckle style, stamped markings, strap construction (folded back and sewn, rather than sandwiched under the lining as earlier examples have been).
The differences in their design can be explained by the markets they were produced for (american verses european) and the customer demographic. The gold sandals still have the stiletto heel from the height of its fame in 1960, but show a square toe which was the new fashion heading towards it's height in 1970. They are the trendier version if you like, of the style above.

DSCF3004.JPG
 
from what i can see of the font on the insoles, it also looks like early 50s, possibly late 40s, not early 60s. the insoles look like leather, not man made materials.
 
Thank you everybody! Those are almost exactly like my shoes except mine are covered all over with the Lurex. The label says Hannahson's exquisite footwear. 881 last.
 
My strap is wider too but mine do have the lurex heel and I think my heel might be a bit shorter and chunkier than the last pair posted and maybe the initial pair too.
This is strange but I always envisioned these shoes as shoes that would be worn while baton twirling.

IMG_2741.jpg

IMG_2731.jpg

IMG_2727.jpg

IMG_2726.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top