Vintage_Visage
Alumni
Yay, first personal encounter with something higher than Neiman Marcus lol..
She needs a cleaning, estate fresh.
The dress is not faded or damaged, just some dirt spots. The brownish fade is from some buildup on my camera lens.
So, as you can see the label has been reattached, poorly. However I feel comfortable saying that the lower right corner stitch in the label could be original.
After looking at other Ceil Chapman, I have seen tons of 50s dresses with same neck lines, sleeve ruching and cut. I have not seen one with the ruching and crisscross appearance at the waist though.
there are two boning strips in the back of the dress.
To me I "think" it is a Ceil, but I have not had any such pieces and I do not want to cheat anyone or myself.
Confirmation of 50s, and possibility of being Ceil.
Thanks all!
Oh yeah, i cant read the zipper but it is written at an angle and says something like conmate conmal comnat ? not sure if there was a zipper associated with Chapman
ty again
She needs a cleaning, estate fresh.
The dress is not faded or damaged, just some dirt spots. The brownish fade is from some buildup on my camera lens.
So, as you can see the label has been reattached, poorly. However I feel comfortable saying that the lower right corner stitch in the label could be original.
After looking at other Ceil Chapman, I have seen tons of 50s dresses with same neck lines, sleeve ruching and cut. I have not seen one with the ruching and crisscross appearance at the waist though.
there are two boning strips in the back of the dress.
To me I "think" it is a Ceil, but I have not had any such pieces and I do not want to cheat anyone or myself.
Confirmation of 50s, and possibility of being Ceil.
Thanks all!
Oh yeah, i cant read the zipper but it is written at an angle and says something like conmate conmal comnat ? not sure if there was a zipper associated with Chapman
ty again