Okay, I'm pretty convinced that I'm going to go with eras. Here's what I've got so far:
Gibson Girls & the Modern Woman ~ 1900-1919
Jazz Babies & Glamour Girls ~ 1920-1936
Liberty Belles ~ 1937-1946
Lovely New Look Sophisticates ~ 1947-1964
Mod Dollies & Today's Woman 1965-1980s
Laura, I hear what you are saying about decades versus movements. I think most people tend to think of fashion, and history in general, in decades. Back several years ago in eBay there was a great debate about restructuring the categories. At that time the categories were according to decades.
But on the VC&A board, there was a constant stream of questions about how do you determine if a dress is 1959 or 1961? And the general feeling was that a dress made in 1961 probably will have more in common with a dress made in 1959, than a dress made in 1965. And after the new categories came out, those types of questions all but stopped, because it no longer really mattered.
I'd appreciate any input/suggestions/criticisms of the way I have this structured, as it's not in stone.
Another thought. I've been doing a lot of research (That means web surfing) into how other websites are structured. It seems to be pretty much half and half, but I've noticed that people who carry mainly 60s and 70s vintage are much more likely to have their categories according to garment type, and people who carry older things do it according to age of clothing.
I was amazed at one site - a fairly well known one. It had 27 categories. I'd think that in this case, less would be better???
Lizzie