Identification help

  • Thread starter Thread starter bycin
  • Start date Start date
B

bycin

Guest
These earrings have me all mixed up... part of me wants to say 80s, another part of me wants to say 60s... both parts could be wrong. lol Experts? Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 2013378jetearrings1.jpg
    2013378jetearrings1.jpg
    67.7 KB · Views: 191
  • 2013378jetearrings2.jpg
    2013378jetearrings2.jpg
    42.5 KB · Views: 195
  • 2013378jetearrings3.jpg
    2013378jetearrings3.jpg
    69.3 KB · Views: 202
  • 2013378jetearrings4.jpg
    2013378jetearrings4.jpg
    55.3 KB · Views: 156
brb with that. It's NOT 80s style, I warn you, with the hole in the middle. One thing that's thrown me on this one. brb
 

Attachments

  • DSC07897.jpg
    DSC07897.jpg
    53.4 KB · Views: 194
Thanks for posting the back Bycin -- I didn't realize that you had added it via Edit. It's interesting for sure -- and the last image of the earring in your hand provides a better idea of scale, since they had read as larger in size (for me) in the initial images, but now appear to be more 'doorknocker' in size and style.

The earring appears to have a bit of goldwash -- looks like rose gold (is that right?). In some pics, it looks more bronzy, and hard to tell. If they are very bronzy and lightweight, they're likely to be later --if not, I would say you're right, as they look more 60's/70's ethnic and the prongs look very 'costumy' in style (faux prongs become more popular later on). I'm sure you'll get more feedback shortly.
 
Thanks, Laura! I am tempted to call them 60s/70s. The rings are more bronzy as you say, the clamper part more rose gold.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top