I'm incredibly embarrassed to have to ask....

[DecadencePast]

Purchased this with a few other higher end items from a local collector - she had it displayed the way I have it worn on the manni form in my photos, BUT ...the more I look at it; the more I am thinking maybe I have it backwards on the form? It has a wrap around construction closing with NUMEROUS hook & eye closures. As it is, the "open" asymmetrical slit edge of the skirt lays on the right - was there ever a 'rule' that generally had a woman's skirt slit to the left? Maybe I'm just over thinking this. Also would think all that fancy embroidery & beading (center 2nd shot) might afford a little modesty if it was in front.

I can't take photos of it shown the other way around yet; but just wonder what first impression your expert eyes might see - it's early 1900s with heavenly steel cut gold metal beading and satin embroidery. TIA ~ KD

 

[Pinkcoke]

Not at all, I'm sure we have all put a garment on a mannequin backwards at some point...
I am inclined to agree that the beading on the bodice should be in front, not only because that is the main decoration, but because the centre seam hook/eye fastening would create unseemly gaping if worn in front, and the wrap appears to overlap and finish with the main border on the beaded side. The skirt is also longer at the back, and this will rise to be more level over a derriere.

 

[Circa Vintage Clothing]

I agree that the openings are likely to be down the back.

What an unusual style! Can you tell what fabric it's made of? Is the embroidery all hand done?