I'm Stumped--1920s Gym dress?

Luna Junction

VFG Member
I checked Google images for 1920s tennis dress and this doesn't seem to be that. I thought maybe gym dress, but I see nothing like it on images either. Then I thought maybe it's a dance practice dress, like a dancing school dress. Maybe it once had bloomers? It's polished cotton/chintz but very soft, not stiff.
Anyone have any other ideas? Older than 20s? It's all hooks in back. From neck to bottom
001 - Copy.JPG
 
Sunny I'm guessing that's not the original hem so it may have been altered elsewhere too, can you show the hem stitching, fastenings and waist internally please?
 
Hi Melanie,
Thanks the hooks and eyes were definitely restored. The stitching looks newer too. I've been worried that this is a repro. Pics here:
 

Attachments

  • 004 copy.jpg
    004 copy.jpg
    48.4 KB · Views: 266
  • 001 copy.jpg
    001 copy.jpg
    62.8 KB · Views: 230
On the photo of the waist there is some cream stitching on the right hand side (on the outside of the garment) can you show this and the reverse of it please?
 
It looks like a costume to me - maybe an older one, like from the 1950s for a production of No No Nanette, or the Boyfriend - something like that. The use of coloured thread that doesn't match the fabric always looks costumey to me, and the shiny silver hooks don't strike me as correct for the 1920s - I would expect dull black hooks and eyes.
 
Jonathan, I agree. Either the hooks were changed and replaced with new ones, or the whole thing is reproduced. The stitching bothers me too. Then again, in a way, it seems as if it were bleached-out a bit and the color of the thread didn't bleach.
 
Interesting dress Sunny - I agree with Jonathan about it being a costume: theatrical costumes often have hooks and eyes as fasteners as they're more reliable than zippers.

Your dress looks to me like it's been altered at the waist - the top half is nicely made, but where the skirt joins the waist is roughly cut and unfinished. Seamstresses tend to continue the same standard of work throughout a garment so I wonder if the skirt was originally longer and rather than rehemming, someone removed it, cut the excess fabric off and resewed to the waistband. The shiny hooks and eyes would have been either added or resewn at that point.

The style itself reminds me of very late '70s to early '80s with the piped neckline and puffed sleeves but your lovely photo does not show the design clearly - I imagine the waist would be dropped, rather than blousoned. The construction looks like home sewer circa '60s or '70s. The top stitched hem (if original and it looks like it, with the same colour thread) suggests to me that it is '70s or '80s - which puts it more into line with the style.

If you can photograph sitting flatly, not blousoned we'll have a clearer idea but I think you're probably looking at a '70s garment with a skirt that has been shortened. Can you tell if the same thread has been used for the top and bottom of the waistband?
 
Hi Nicole,
Thanks for this info. The thread top-stitching in the waistband is the same in both places. I'm adding a pic on a hanger.
All-in-all, I think I'll save this for Halloween!
 

Attachments

  • 016.JPG
    016.JPG
    39.7 KB · Views: 222
Back
Top