Need Help Dating David Morris Red Dress

lipsticklillie

Registered Guest
I have done as much research as possible to date this dress, but I just can't pinpoint it. There is no lining and the inside seams have a zig zag edge. The small tag inside on the side seam says Size 12 but this is much smaller probably more like a size 2 or 4 with ample room for a bigger bust. I hope someone will be able to help me date this.

Thank you!

Rebecca
 

Attachments

  • 2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 001 (800x599).jpg
    2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 001 (800x599).jpg
    301.4 KB · Views: 223
  • 2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 002 (800x582).jpg
    2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 002 (800x582).jpg
    334.5 KB · Views: 228
  • 2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 003 (800x590).jpg
    2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 003 (800x590).jpg
    330.3 KB · Views: 224
  • 2012-10-06 001 2012-10-06 037.JPG
    2012-10-06 001 2012-10-06 037.JPG
    836.9 KB · Views: 233
  • 2012-10-06 001 2012-10-06 041.JPG
    2012-10-06 001 2012-10-06 041.JPG
    752.7 KB · Views: 213
  • 2012-10-06 001 2012-10-06 043.JPG
    2012-10-06 001 2012-10-06 043.JPG
    116.7 KB · Views: 194
  • 2012-10-06 001 2012-10-06 045.JPG
    2012-10-06 001 2012-10-06 045.JPG
    774.9 KB · Views: 231
Hi Rebecca,

Your pics of the labels are great, but the dress ones are tiny! Any chance you could show us some bigger ones? It's hard to see the style properly. One showing the dress in full length, so we can see how long it is, will help too. Thank you.
 
Thank you - I'll go with '80s. I could believe late '60s if the skirt has been shortened, and the inside construction warrants it - but on the available evidence, the style looks '80s even though some elements of the labels and construction say earlier. Do you have a photo of the interior of the bodice? I'd like to put this one in the late '60s if I could.
 
Here are some photos of the interior of the dress.
 

Attachments

  • 2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 001 (763x800).jpg
    2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 001 (763x800).jpg
    286.5 KB · Views: 165
  • 2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 002 (800x497).jpg
    2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 002 (800x497).jpg
    221.2 KB · Views: 208
  • 2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 003 (800x529).jpg
    2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 003 (800x529).jpg
    243.5 KB · Views: 209
  • 2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 004 (800x729).jpg
    2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 004 (800x729).jpg
    307.6 KB · Views: 186
  • 2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 005 (800x600).jpg
    2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 005 (800x600).jpg
    282.6 KB · Views: 205
  • 2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 006 (800x599).jpg
    2012-10-28 001 2012-10-28 006 (800x599).jpg
    255 KB · Views: 208
I would agree with Nicole on late 60s with those new shots.
That label, the ruffled neckline and size 12 fitting like a modern 2 or 4 all say late 60s to me.
 
Back
Top