plousia
Registered Guest
This super adorable dress has me all kinds of confused. I was thinking 40s/50s, but the drop waist and the unusual shape of the waist, along with unusual belt loops (two on the front, two on the back, and strips of fabric rather than those thin twisted cords that seem more usual for 50s) and serging are throwing me off.
It's cotton, as far as I can tell pure cotton.
Commercially made. A back of neck label has been cut out, no other labels.
There is overlocking inside as well as straight stitching, no pinked seams.
The skirt is very full. It looks short because of the drop waist, but the hem appears original, and the dress falls to mid-calf on me, which seems about right for 50s-ish.
The print is amazingly adorable, black and white gingham with bows which are dotted with tiny hearts. It's almost TOO cute, like someone was trying to make something look vintage.
Maybe 70s does some other decade?? No polyester though, and the sleeves don't seem right for 70s, nor the length.
It's cotton, as far as I can tell pure cotton.
Commercially made. A back of neck label has been cut out, no other labels.
There is overlocking inside as well as straight stitching, no pinked seams.
The skirt is very full. It looks short because of the drop waist, but the hem appears original, and the dress falls to mid-calf on me, which seems about right for 50s-ish.
The print is amazingly adorable, black and white gingham with bows which are dotted with tiny hearts. It's almost TOO cute, like someone was trying to make something look vintage.
Maybe 70s does some other decade?? No polyester though, and the sleeves don't seem right for 70s, nor the length.
Attachments
-
PXL_20230912_220024184.jpg134.4 KB · Views: 190
-
PXL_20230912_220208088.jpg96.8 KB · Views: 198
-
PXL_20230912_220151329.jpg83.9 KB · Views: 192
-
PXL_20230912_220120195.jpg108.4 KB · Views: 194
-
PXL_20230912_220024184.jpg134.4 KB · Views: 187
-
PXL_20230912_220010333.jpg53.8 KB · Views: 191
-
PXL_20230912_220136112.MP.jpg62.7 KB · Views: 190
Last edited: