I could not resist this dress. I just caved and could not pass it up.
There is one single belt loop that is high set, empire style. I added a scarf to show where it sits. it is just at the top edge of where the scarf is, just under the bust darts. It is inconspicuous so one might get away without a belt adn leaving the loop in tact. I imagine it would be a white cord type tie belt, but am not quite sure. My scarf would be a bit wider than what was original. What do you think it was, or is it something that you would throw the original notion out the window and just go with what looked okay? And would you wait on offering it for sale until you matched it up with a belt, or would you let the new owner decide what their taste is. (and just show it tied to amplify the sihouette).
It's Serbin by Muriel Ryan and it is a signature print (you can see the Serbin signature in the design). I noticed neither are in the label resource...but maybe that can be fixed I will take a scan of the label.
Unbelted...I like belted..but with something more apropriate...better .
Chris
There is one single belt loop that is high set, empire style. I added a scarf to show where it sits. it is just at the top edge of where the scarf is, just under the bust darts. It is inconspicuous so one might get away without a belt adn leaving the loop in tact. I imagine it would be a white cord type tie belt, but am not quite sure. My scarf would be a bit wider than what was original. What do you think it was, or is it something that you would throw the original notion out the window and just go with what looked okay? And would you wait on offering it for sale until you matched it up with a belt, or would you let the new owner decide what their taste is. (and just show it tied to amplify the sihouette).
It's Serbin by Muriel Ryan and it is a signature print (you can see the Serbin signature in the design). I noticed neither are in the label resource...but maybe that can be fixed I will take a scan of the label.
Unbelted...I like belted..but with something more apropriate...better .
Chris