Victorian Wedding Dress 1890's or theatrical repro?

Lynette

Registered Guest
I have been given a dress by an old lady who told me it was her grandmother's wedding dress in the 1890s. I have some doubts. I think it is rayon - now I know rayon was starting to be introduced at that time as artificial silk... but hmm. It is rayon cutwork there is internal connected netting and under that muslin inserts to the hips, front and back. There are loosely inserted shoulder pads. There is also a separate slip in ivory and cream which is definitely silk. There are popper studs and hooks to fasten at the side (these look horribly recent, so either they are a replacement or this is a strong indicator this is not original) It doesnt look as aged as I might expect although there are some brown age spots and a few holes on the lining. Any ideas anyone whether this might be original or whether it is some kind of theatrical replica?
 

Attachments

  • 024.JPG
    024.JPG
    645.5 KB · Views: 316
  • 010.JPG
    010.JPG
    551 KB · Views: 275
  • 005.JPG
    005.JPG
    565 KB · Views: 269
  • 025.JPG
    025.JPG
    61.1 KB · Views: 234
  • 022.JPG
    022.JPG
    61.8 KB · Views: 271
  • 017.JPG
    017.JPG
    53.6 KB · Views: 292
I thought rayon was introduced in the 1920s.
If its not a reproduction, my guess would be early 40s
 
The fabric in the dress was popular in the 1940's. The slip/under dress looks much older, perhaps 1910's.
Has anyone done a blog on how confused family reports on older clothing can be. And how to handle it tactfully when buying? I'd like to know how others handle it.
Marian
 
Hi,

Another vote for 1940's on the dress on all counts. There is nothing 1890's about it either in fabric or in style. I cannot tell when the slip is from, but it does not appear to be original to the dress and does have a vaguely 1917-ish silhouette.
 
I agree, the style of the dress looks very 1940s, especially with that sweetheart neckline. Rayon was very popular in the 40s too. I am not sure about the slip.
 
Thanks all, that is really helpful. Maybe the petticoat came from the lady's grandmother... but as you say, the dress is of a much later date. Funny how when someone tells you something categorically, although it doesnt feel/look right, you can almost suspend all your instinct, particularly as I really deal in current second hand and vintage is just a small and occasional off shoot for me, so I dont always feel very confident of my judgement. Thanks again, Lynette
 
I agree with the others; very early '40s for the dress, and earlier for the petticoat, maybe Edwardian. I've found quite a few wedding gowns have older petticoats, I wonder if they were the mother's, and it was the "old" in "something old".

Only yesterday a man brought me his mother's wedding dress from 1943 - what we found when we opened the bag was his sister's dress from the late '60s. Apparently for decades the mother had been telling everyone it had been her dress! I love old ladies, but they can be unreliable for datings.
 
Back
Top