collectables of the future?

vanzy10

Registered Guest
What to invest in now which will be a future collectable?
I go for Maharishi trousers and "Pleats Please" dresses. They are cheap now because they are out of fashion but I think they are design classics of the future.
I also think edwardian cotton clothes are surprisingly inexpensve, (though they are fashionable now?)but perhaps they will never be worth a fortune....
Vanessa
 
Well, I have kept most of my 80's dress clothes in hopes that they will be collectible one day. :D
 
Away from major designer clothes, which will always end up collectable in the future. Red or Dead/Sarah Whitworth and others like that. I also think that good Topshop/Hennes pieces will be the Biba of the future, and I'm personally banking on the likes of Warehouse and Karen Millen being collectable in a similar way - I never buy <B>them</b> brand new, but rarely turn down a good, select piece in a charity shop.

Liz
 
Well aside from brand names / specific makers, you need to look at style. A nice, well made item that epitomizes the time will always be wanted. Think about 50s dresses. When someone wants to collect 50s dresses generally they are thinking about small waists, full skirts and lots of crinoline. Clothes from the 50s that don't scream 1950s just aren't as desirable. Items that are difficult to date, stylewise, don't go for as much money.
If your buying up 80s clothes, you want to go for all the big shoulder pads, the exersize look, things that are icons of the time. I don't know about 90s items. Perhaps high waisted dresses / babydoll dresses - that little girl gone bad look that was popular in the mid-90s.

Just another perspective:)
Connie
 
Most importantly, collect what you like and can feel passionate about. Don't just buy things because you think they will bring money later or people tell you that you should like of you don't.. Pay attention and be a sponge about construction and quality but don't start collecting any particular era or thing because you think you should. otherwise you are going to be sitting with a bunch of things that you don't like for a long long time to wait for the right moment.

If there is an era or a style that really gets you enthusiastic...collect the very best examples you can of that time or type of clothing. (even the things that no one recognizes now) You don't need to start with a couture dress that sells for thousands...you can keep trading up. I have sold a lot of handbags to buy others for example as my tastes, interest, and knowledge change.

I agree with Connie about picking things that really embody an era.

For example, the 80s outrageous prom dresses sell well...sell the cheaper made ones and keep an example that is meticulously made with a label - but really still screams 80s for the future if that is what you like.

As far as edwardian whites...it is like anything else...the best quality will always win out and always be more desirable save for if someone very famous wore it. There is a lot out there because they lasted a long time. For example, I found a nightgown that had the most beautiful tiny pleating and I had one that was ho-hum. you bet the beautiful one sold for good bucks and no one looked at the other one. The market also is flooded with edwardian/victorian inspired and you have to get an eye for that.

As far as 90s...babydoll was definitely in. The 3/4 length suit coat paired with a miniskirt was in. I would get ahold of fashion mags from the years in question as well to get a feel also for the looks on what was trendy and look for the names of the designers as well who came on the scene for the first time in a big way. AFterall, its not just looks but names people sometimes remember later
 
You don't need to start with a couture dress that sells for thousands...you can keep trading up....
For example, the 80s outrageous prom dresses sell well...sell the cheaper made ones and keep an example that is meticulously made with a label - but really still screams 80s for the future if that is what you like.

Yes. I needed an 80s poof skirted dress (is that what they are called?) for mu collection. I started with a prom dress label, then I sold it when I found a Victor Costa. The Costa was traded off when I found a wonderful Scassi. I really want a LaCroix, but the Scassi is actually collection-worthy, so I'm pretty much satisfied in that department.
 
I have been hoarding Nicole Miller ties for a couple of years now. Hoping her novelty prints will be uber collectible in the future - but in the meantime I just think they are cool and make me smile.

BTW, I love discussing this topic and hearing what others opinions of future collectibles are!!!!!!!!!!!
 
I have seen several celebs wearing 80's like items recently, and I have alot of 80's items just ready and waiting. :USING:

I can see items like Madonna, for example, being a huge example of a trend that will come back in style once again. I also agree that finding mags with the fashion of that time and collecting stuff from there. Things made in the 90's are really cheap and out of style at the moment, but as proven by past, all trend eras come back to life again.

You will need to decide if you want to buy things out of style. If you have the storage to hold out for those out of style items until they do come into style. But most of all I suggest going with your instincts/gut feelings.

And of course, best of luck in your searchs and finds!!!!!
 
Of course all this "future collectable" stuff is just an excuse for me to indulge myself and buy things i love! :) does anyone collect Frank Usher by the way? I think the label has been going since (at least) the 1950s but I always associate it with extreme 80s eveningwear.
I have a so-eighties big shoulder gaultier suit. I was going to sell it but now I reckon I won't (after what everyone has said).
I also collect mens neckties they are always so cheap, you can get great designers and designs etc. But that is just for fun. I tell myself I will auction them as a lot one day or open a tie shop...... ho ho. In my dreams....
I couldn't agree more that quality sells- well, stuff that is gorgeous- of whatever vintage or designer.
 
I love Frank Usher. Essentially it's a copyist label like Victor Costa or Bernshaw, but anything pre-mid 70s is well worthing buying. I believe the company started in the 40s, really surged in popularity in the 50s (copying the Paris fashion houses, I have some extraordinary 50s Ushers and they're all near couture quality). In the 60s and 70s they did some fabulous Varon/Clark etc copies and their sexy jersey dresses often do REALLY well! I think I probably hold the record for an Usher sale on eBay, but purely by default because it was the same design that Kylie Minogue wore at a party (yes, even Kylie wears vintage Frank Usher)!! :D

Liz
 
As far as the 90s...I agree with Bonnie on Nicole Miller prints. Lilly Pulitzer is perrennial and Vested Gentress has a following. Even though Nicole Miller has a slightly different market than the very pretty, very casual VG and LP, people tend to like novelty prints.
 
I will have to find you some pictures.

here is what she is currently doing...
http://www.nicolemiller.com

her clothes still have prints incorporated them strongly but in the 90s, she had a lot of ties, blouses, scarves, etc with more whimsical prints. Instead of just being one image repeated over and over, it has a larger repeat.

There is a candy tie I think that has every candy you could think of on it versus just a 1" image section repeated over and over. I am looking for some good examples...
 
Totally forgot about Miller'e line....I like her designs....

reminds me that "My Michelle" was a big line in the 90's. Actually can still buy the line.
 
My Michelle had some trendy looks but the quality of the construction of the clothing is something I probably would advise away from buying with an eye towards the future (at least in my opinion). It was sold by middle range department stores mostly in the juniors dept/young and modern dept and it copied other looks. There was probably differing qualities, but a lot of things just don't hold up to a lot of washings. I remember picking items up on the racks back then when it was all new and remember how paper thin some things where. I had a jacket/skirt set that had been given to me and remember that the jacket was never the same after washed once(and it was washable). Unlike some items like the lower quality of their line things Biba made in the 60s that were meant to be worn to be trendy a few times and then they would be done (but then again, people must be kicking themselves for not keeping those back in the day), My Michelle did not have the cultural significance of doing anything new. it was just some cute things at a price point.

If you start to be able to spot them repetitiously though...it will help train your eye to look for similar looks in lines with better construction. If someone out there thinks I am wrong and that My Michelle will be worth gold someday and I will regret not hording it, then don't listen to me, but at least don't buy the plainest examples, buy the examples that scream early 90s - black and white (esp half the jacket one color/half the other, colorblocked designs, and polkadots with smaller versions of 80s shoulder pads. You can sell them to folks when the 90s come back as retro and save the couture for when its vintage.
 
I don't think you can get Nicole Miller in England. I couldn't see any whimsical prints in the website, but I guess I could always do a search on ebay!
What about the cheaper "designer" ranges for Debenhams (Designers putting their name to ranges specifically for cheap/midrange department store) etc. Eg Mathew williamson for Debenhams, Tatty devine for New Look, Karl Largerfield for Hennes?

I once sold a 1991 Vivienne Westwood for Sock Shop "body" (you know those all in one knicker/top sets) it was well worn and everything (yuk, someone elses underwear) and it got a surprisingly high price.
But that was Westwood, and it was just at the time of the v and a exhibition. perhaps those other designers are a waste of time.....

http://search.ebay.co.uk/_W0QQsassZvanzy10QQhtZ-1
 
Well..there is a whole "other" following for yucky underwear "freshly laundered optional" if you know what I mean. You may be right that the westwoodness had additional appeal

As far as the designers who lend their name to a lower priced line. Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Its hard to say. What is different nowadays is that the designers are actually designing the lines, not just licensing their name. It has become the thing to do. And I really can't answer that.
 
:barf:
Oh erg. It was, of course clean!
I love and wear vintage clothes (of COURSE) but I draw the line at underwear.
 
I've been wondering about vintage 70s-90s, since I do the garage sale thing here. I can pick up poly print shirts, poly dresses and the basic wardrobe of Jane Fonda in 9 to 5 about every weekend, if I want. I've had luck finding horrid 80s prom, and can get the basic sweater now and again.

My question is: what will be the 70s to 90s version of the cotton day dress? That every day item that people want for the nostalgic value?
I have storage, and I hope to do this for a while...so why not?

Jenn
 
Jenn,

I do have one prediction on "day wear" for the 70s and 80s. there might be no "day dress" situation as women started really wearing pants more and more than their mothers and dressing more unisex during the day. But here is my one little tidbit and try really hard not to laugh lol.

what has a small following right now that is slowly and steadily growing is the dearth of 70s poly and I probably mentioned this before is the better photoprints from the 70s. Right now you might not be rich from them. but i have noticed that in things i have had there are a fair amount of bids and interest. they don't go for a million dollars but the interest steadily grows, especially those that reproduce a painting from one of the masters, etc., or feature a popular crossover theme.

When polyester was invented, and became popular, prints exploded again because makers had freedom like they never had before. It was more colorfast than even wool, but the weave was so fine that photorealistic images were possible with that kind of precision for the very first time.

So like it or hate it, that is my uninformed two cents for something common and everyday that might be something biggerin the future that people are throwing away or overlooking now

Chris
 
Back
Top