Help With a 1930's Wedding Dress

steve w

Registered Guest
I recently got this from a friend who bought it as a 'hand embroidered 1930's Wedding dress' - She paid a small fortune for it - over $ 500 but I am suspect of it as it does not appear to be hand embroidered - it fastens up the back with metal press studs and I dont see anything like it in searches for 1930's Wedding dresses.
I could be totally wrong so if anyone is able to help or enlighten me I would be very grateful ...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0776.jpeg
    IMG_0776.jpeg
    63.2 KB · Views: 155
  • IMG_0777.jpeg
    IMG_0777.jpeg
    98 KB · Views: 157
  • IMG_0778.jpeg
    IMG_0778.jpeg
    99.4 KB · Views: 152
  • IMG_0783.jpeg
    IMG_0783.jpeg
    52.3 KB · Views: 157
  • IMG_0787.jpeg
    IMG_0787.jpeg
    84.6 KB · Views: 147
Thank you -Yes I am doubtful as well so hoping to get some clarity - Do you know if press studs were even used in the 1930's ?
 
Thank you -Yes I am doubtful as well so hoping to get some clarity - Do you know if press studs were even used in the 1930's ?
They were certainly around but I can't remember anything I have ever owned from the 1930s had snap fasteners, unless added later.

The item is still nice but why did your friend think it a wedding gown or for that matter anything to do with weddings?
 
I share your skepticism. As Marsha said, snaps (press studs) had been in use for a long time before the 1930's. The garment(?) is not embroidery. At first glance I think it is a type of tape lace. There was a time period - I think in the 60's and 70's - when it was popular to convert table linens into skirts, shawls and even dresses. Could you show us some seams so we can see how it was shaped?
Marian
 
Do you know if press studs were even used in the 1930's
Oh, definitely! But that is not the only thing to determine dating by. I would also not call it embroidered. It's a kind of lace, and looks more caftan to me - something upcycled maybe? No idea about the age of the lace, but the garment is surely a lot later than 1930s.
 
Thank you all -- Very informative - The material is thick like a tablecloth or linen so that makes sense - the reason she thought it was a wedding dress is because she was told that by the vintage store she bought it from so I appreciate the feedback ...
 
I share your skepticism. As Marsha said, snaps (press studs) had been in use for a long time before the 1930's. The garment(?) is not embroidery. At first glance I think it is a type of tape lace. There was a time period - I think in the 60's and 70's - when it was popular to convert table linens into skirts, shawls and even dresses. Could you show us some seams so we can see how it was shaped?
Marian
Hi These are the best pics I have to show the seams ..I think its machine stitched but am but am not sure..
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0781.jpeg
    IMG_0781.jpeg
    110.6 KB · Views: 117
  • IMG_0786.jpeg
    IMG_0786.jpeg
    97.6 KB · Views: 118
Thank you all -- Very informative - The material is thick like a tablecloth or linen so that makes sense - the reason she thought it was a wedding dress is because she was told that by the vintage store she bought it from so I appreciate the feedback ...
BIB, That I understand and as a man something I may not have questioned when I first started collecting and no doubt she bought in good faith, but a wedding dress??
 
Looks like an upcycled circular table cover to me. Yes, tape lace on most of it. Could have been made over in the 1970s, or very recently. It also is not a 1930s style at all. If I were your friend I would return it, as $500 is a rip off for that in my opinion. Not 1930s, and not a wedding dress. Looks more like shapeless poncho with sleeves.
oh I agree - problem was she bought it a few years back and only showed it to me recently ....but thank you !
 
The fabric could be earlier but like the experts suggest I agree it has been up cycled in the 70s. Press studs were used in 1930s dresses though, I had a white dress which was 1930s and had several tiny press studs to the front.
 
Back
Top