crinolinegirl
Alumni
My \"new\" old shoes!
Found these while on holiday in sunny old Mablethorpe...
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/gingham1.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/gingham2.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/gingham3.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/gingham4.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/gingham5.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/pink1.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/pink2.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/pink3.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/pink4.jpg">
Thet are both made out of printed kid leather and have straight soles with small wedge heels.
I'm dating them to right on 1800 (does that seem about right Jonathan?) as the toes aren't as pointy as 1780's and early 1790's toes were and it seems that after 1810, toes started to become squared off. I found a 1798 fashion plate in one of my books with a lady wearing a pair of similar pointed toe shoes but as you all know, most people were a few years behind the fashion plates.
They are much more coarser and primitive in construction than Regency shoes that I have seen and are made much more wider than Regency and Victorian shoes too! They are lined in coarse linen, much coarser than later slippers and the green and yellow gingham pair even have leather patches sewn on the insides at sides of the foot to provide an extra layer between the hard floor, thin leather of the shoe and the splay of the foot over the sole!
This gingham pair is fairly large too, about a US 8 and VERY WIDE. I don't normally try on 200 year old shoes but these are wide enough for my own size 10 feet! The lilac pair are a bit smaller in size but still made very wide too.
The gingham pair have their original label stuck in advertising Rosbie and Fearon. I swear I have heard of them before but of course, I can't find any reference in my books at the moment.
Neat huh?
Lei
Found these while on holiday in sunny old Mablethorpe...
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/gingham1.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/gingham2.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/gingham3.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/gingham4.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/gingham5.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/pink1.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/pink2.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/pink3.jpg">
<img src="http://www.corsetsandcrinolines.com/example/pink4.jpg">
Thet are both made out of printed kid leather and have straight soles with small wedge heels.
I'm dating them to right on 1800 (does that seem about right Jonathan?) as the toes aren't as pointy as 1780's and early 1790's toes were and it seems that after 1810, toes started to become squared off. I found a 1798 fashion plate in one of my books with a lady wearing a pair of similar pointed toe shoes but as you all know, most people were a few years behind the fashion plates.
They are much more coarser and primitive in construction than Regency shoes that I have seen and are made much more wider than Regency and Victorian shoes too! They are lined in coarse linen, much coarser than later slippers and the green and yellow gingham pair even have leather patches sewn on the insides at sides of the foot to provide an extra layer between the hard floor, thin leather of the shoe and the splay of the foot over the sole!
This gingham pair is fairly large too, about a US 8 and VERY WIDE. I don't normally try on 200 year old shoes but these are wide enough for my own size 10 feet! The lilac pair are a bit smaller in size but still made very wide too.
The gingham pair have their original label stuck in advertising Rosbie and Fearon. I swear I have heard of them before but of course, I can't find any reference in my books at the moment.
Neat huh?

Lei