Need help identifying top hat label

T

Tony Davis

Registered Guest
Hi

I’ve just registered for your forum as I’m trying to identify the maker of a top hat we own. I attach the label which does not include a maker’s name. Any help will be gratefully accepted.

Thanks, Tony
 

Attachments

  • 2A2F8102-F85C-4CCA-96BF-6717D07CF722.jpeg
    2A2F8102-F85C-4CCA-96BF-6717D07CF722.jpeg
    37 KB · Views: 413
Generally speaking the logo/crest having a crown would denote that it was an outfitter by royal appointment.
 
Thanks for your replies, here are some more photos, including a clearer one of the logo
 

Attachments

  • 20210807_093700.jpg
    20210807_093700.jpg
    26.3 KB · Views: 282
  • 20210807_093713.jpg
    20210807_093713.jpg
    29.2 KB · Views: 275
  • 20210807_093739.jpg
    20210807_093739.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 262
  • 20210807_093759.jpg
    20210807_093759.jpg
    73 KB · Views: 407
GemGem said:
Generally speaking the logo/crest having a crown would denote that it was an outfitter by royal appointment.
Click to expand...
I agree but usually, if by royal appointment, it would be plastered with a retailer name or the manufacture.

It is possible the logo means nothing, gives the item an air of--well what ever, manufactures aren't beyond that.

The hat looks relatively modern going by its condition and looks great.
 
Looks like a great hat. Can you show the entire inside, please? These top hats are notoriousy difficult to date without more information on the maker (and even then). I would place it in the early part of the 20th century, 1900-1920s but cannot say for sure. Made of silk plush, not beaver. If you can determine the size by measuring the inside circumference, that can effect the value. Larger sizes generally fetch higher values.
 
Rue_de_la_Paix said:
Looks like a great hat. Can you show the entire inside, please? These top hats are notoriousy difficult to date without more information on the maker (and even then). I would place it in the early part of the 20th century, 1900-1920s but cannot say for sure. Made of silk plush, not beaver. If you can determine the size by measuring the inside circumference, that can effect the value. Larger sizes generally fetch higher values.
Click to expand...
I would have thought style wise, Victorian and I would be wonderfully surprised if the hat saw the 1920s.

It comes across to me at least a relatively modern reproduction.

But as you write such things can be notoriously difficult to date.
 
Here is a photo of the entire inside of the hat. I really appreciate the help you guys are giving.
 

Attachments

  • 20210807_232631.jpg
    20210807_232631.jpg
    38.1 KB · Views: 413
Thanks for the added photos. Definitely not modern nor a reproduction. With that extra wide sweatband, I might even place this pre 1900. Again, these are hard to date as the style changed very little over the decades.
 
I agree it's not a reproduction.

Lets look at the logo, three lions, that's the Emblem of England, it's a Queens Crown, and orb, The Ship, I don't know, Rule Britannia maybe and the Garters, Order of or Silk Wedding Garters?. If the hat is made of plush silk, that fits nicely.

It's not by Royal appointment, it's more a made up logo.
 
I have recently looked into this as bought three top hats and researched the emblems a little. Hatters were given a little free range when it came to designing their own crest and did not always include a name. It is certainly an older top hat, likely Victorian. The exact height will help with dating.
https://www.silktophats.eu/coatsofarms.html
 
GemGem said:
I have recently looked into this as bought three top hats and researched the emblems a little. Hatters were given a little free range when it came to designing their own crest and did not always include a name. It is certainly an older top hat, likely Victorian. The exact height will help with dating.
https://www.silktophats.eu/coatsofarms.html
Click to expand...
Hi Gem-Gem,

A little free range by whom?

Like you I own several hats with these made up emblems, it's just blatant one upmanship from yesterday years, kind of giving the appearance of by royal warrant association.

However the hat is older then I first thought, I don't think imo it is actually Victorian, although in style possibly, 30s 40s maybe?? so it is almost an antique in any case.:)
 
Avantbo said:
Hi Gem-Gem,

A little free range by whom?

Like you I own several hats with these made up emblems, it's just blatant one upmanship from yesterday years, kind of giving the appearance of by royal warrant association.

However the hat is older then I first thought, I don't think imo it is actually Victorian, although in style possibly, 30s 40s maybe?? so it is almost an antique in any case.:)
Click to expand...
If you place the ‘royal’ crown in anything, the crown can sue you for misuse. If an emblem has a royal crown it most certainly has been permitted by the crown.
If you look at the link I posted it explains a great deal about top hats history, a great resource! it is also possible to narrow down the date by the height of the hat, it would be super helpful if we could have that information. It is very unlikely to be any later than the 1910’s. It does look as though the crown is a Prince of Wales crown emblem. That ship on the left usually signifies Manchester. So quite likely the Hatters were based in Manchester in the UK. Quite a lot of decoding can be required but if the research is done the information does seem to be available
 
Last edited:
GemGem said:
If you place the crown in anything, the crown can sue you for misuse. If an emblem has a crown it most certainly has been permitted by the crown.
Click to expand...

That is not the case. Using a crown emblem in a hat or garment does not require the permission of the Royal Family (The Crown as you refer to i). A crown is a very common thing to find on top hats of all makers. It is only is one were to use the actual Royal Emblem of The Crown with the lion and other Royal symbols, that you would need permission. It would also be accompanied by wording indicating the maker was appointed or warranted by the Royal Family.

There were hundreds of hat makers who used a crown symbol, so finding out yours will take a lot of research and even then maybe come up empty handed. But keep trying!

The hat has all the correct bells and whistles to be Victorian, maybe early Edwardian. It is not from the 1930s or 1940s.

That website mentioned by GemGem has a couple of errors and misleading statements. It is not a great resource in my educated opinion. But I will not get into that here.
 
Last edited:
Rue_de_la_Paix said:
That is not the case. Using a crown emblem in a hat or garment does not require the permission of the Royal Family (The Crown as you refer to i). A crown is a very common thing to find on top hats of all makers. It is only is one were to use the actual Royal Emblem of The Crown with the lion and other Royal symbols, that you would need permission. It would also be accompanied by wording indicating the maker was appointed or warranted by the Royal Family.

There were hundreds of hat makers who used a crown symbol, so finding out yours will take a lot of research and even then maybe come up empty handed. But keep trying!

The hat has all the correct bells and whistles to be Victorian, maybe early Edwardian. It is not from the 1930s or 1940s.
Click to expand...
Apologies, I have edited my post to be clear, I meant one of the ‘royal’ crowns. This one looks to be the prince of Wales crown.
 
Sorry been off line for a bit. The knowledge on this site is just astounding. Some body asked about the height of the hat. It is 6 inches max ie the brim curve up a little front & back.
 
Tony Davis said:
Sorry been off line for a bit. The knowledge on this site is just astounding. Some body asked about the height of the hat. It is 6 inches max ie the brim curve up a little front & back.
Click to expand...
Hi, can you measure it is cms from the base to the top, outside and inside? Maybe take a photo? It would help.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top