Help Dating a Prairie Style Calico Nightgown

DaisyandStella

DaisyandStella

VFG Member
Hi all!
I have a calico print prairie style nightgown that I'm having a hard time dating. It has a built-in bodice placket with button closures, eyelet lace and crochet lace trim. The model actually is wearing it backwards I believe as the button placket should be in front.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • DSCF8493.jpg
    DSCF8493.jpg
    110.6 KB · Views: 354
  • DSCF8508.jpg
    DSCF8508.jpg
    100.2 KB · Views: 396
  • DSCF8519.jpg
    DSCF8519.jpg
    145.3 KB · Views: 363
  • DSCF8528.jpg
    DSCF8528.jpg
    137 KB · Views: 370
  • DSCF9437.jpg
    DSCF9437.jpg
    96.4 KB · Views: 319
  • DSCF9451.jpg
    DSCF9451.jpg
    110.2 KB · Views: 323
  • DSCF9458.jpg
    DSCF9458.jpg
    86.1 KB · Views: 381
  • IMG_7601.JPG
    IMG_7601.JPG
    150.2 KB · Views: 359
  • IMG_7602.JPG
    IMG_7602.JPG
    79.8 KB · Views: 319
  • IMG_7603.JPG
    IMG_7603.JPG
    90.2 KB · Views: 332
blubirdboutique said:
Hmm I would consider this a dress, not a nightgown. Definitely looks 70s to me and it has great resale value. Reminds me of a gunne sax. Very hippie/boho.
Click to expand...
Thank you! I agree it definitely has that hippie boho vibe but with the inner placket, quality of the cotton and lace I was thinking it may be older than 1970s.
 
Definitely older, does up the front not the back. I've always called these pioneer dresses, not sure that would be the correct term, but that is how I see them. Looks pre-1900 to me. Wondering if it might be as early as 1860s. Looks like what have been worn at home. Let's see what others have to say.
 
Vinclothes said:
I would like to see close ups of the fabric including the eyelet.
Marian
Click to expand...
Marian here are some more images taken from my iphone. Let me know if you would like bigger or higher quality. Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7620.JPG
    IMG_7620.JPG
    131.6 KB · Views: 306
  • IMG_7621.JPG
    IMG_7621.JPG
    116.1 KB · Views: 331
  • IMG_7622.JPG
    IMG_7622.JPG
    124.7 KB · Views: 289
  • IMG_7623.JPG
    IMG_7623.JPG
    125.8 KB · Views: 302
That is really lovely. I would place it in the very early 1900s, around 1903-1905 ish. I don't see it as a nightgown. It is not a tea gown, tea gowns were much more lavish and were meant to be seen by guests in the home. Your lovely garment would have been worn around the home in the mornings, for lounging, taking breakfast, conducting the toilette, etc.

You could call it a wrapper. The Watteau back is a wonderful touch, and the tiny printed roses are so sweet!

Really nice!
 
Last edited:
My research leads me to believe that earlier "tea gowns" weren't particularly lavish. Some were used during pregnancy for the functionality of the loose fit. I would almost go so far as to say that wrappers evolved into tea gowns and then tea gowns evolved into the lacy, lavish delicacies that comes to mind with that term. :) It's a never ending research pet project of mine.

Now where did I put my file on that?? :puzzled:
 
Diana,

That may be true, but by the time this garment was made, a tea gown was indeed a very lavish affair, meant to be worn while entertaining guests at home. To refer to this garment as such would be incorrect. As the fashions terms change, the shapes and construction of the garments behind them change along with the terminology. I was simply keeping pace with the time period in which this was made. No one in that time would ever entertain guests in that sheer gown. It was far too intimate a garment.

I won't disagree much further here on this thread, but I have a much different pool of research on the subject of tea gowns. :)
 
BrookeNault said:
Would you call this print calico?
Click to expand...


i wouldn't...yours is much more "fancy" imo, I would describe it as a delicate floral print.

these are more of what I consider to be calico:

IMG_4085%2B%2528800x578%2529.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top