Help identifying an aquascutum coat's age and fur

shaeshepherd

Registered Guest
Hi! I recently inherited an aquascutum cashmere/wool coat and want to know:

a) what year or range of years it was likely manufactured and sold,
b) what kind of material/fur is on the epaulettes (hoping I'm using the correct term); is it cashmere, wool, a combo, or is it something different and wasn't included on the label for some reason?

The previous owner moved to Alberta, Canada in the mid-1960s, so that lines up with the label for Henry Singer (which still operates in Edmonton). I would personally guess 1965-1979 but that's a wide range that I would love to narrow down. I reviewed other Aquascutum posts on this forum and found some possibly useful reference material to determine the age. This post has a coat with similar tags and folks there think it's late 60s or early 70s. This post has what I assume are more modern tags and drops the "Queen Mother" component on the collar tag, so I'm guessing that makes it newer than the one I have. Meanwhile this discussion is over a coat with several matching features (the orange paper tag inside a pocket, the stitched size patch, even the mysterious XXX or XXL on the collar tag) - folks there thought that one was late 70s. The patch identifying how to clean and its materials on the one I have though is different and imo looks older than the one in that post, so perhaps that means the one I have is early 70s rather than late 70s? EDIT: Just found a label bank that has a pretty near identical label for Aquascutum that is dated for early 1980s.

As for the fur, I have no idea how to figure that out.

I've attached images of the coat, close-up of one epaulette, and every tag. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • 20210515_172946.jpg
    20210515_172946.jpg
    59.2 KB · Views: 232
  • 20210515_172953.jpg
    20210515_172953.jpg
    57.2 KB · Views: 203
  • 20210515_173010.jpg
    20210515_173010.jpg
    27.4 KB · Views: 176
  • 20210515_173015.jpg
    20210515_173015.jpg
    61.5 KB · Views: 187
  • 20210515_173035.jpg
    20210515_173035.jpg
    26.5 KB · Views: 182
  • 20210515_173404.jpg
    20210515_173404.jpg
    22.4 KB · Views: 183
  • 20210515_175720.jpg
    20210515_175720.jpg
    39 KB · Views: 196
Last edited:
Thanks for your reply Ruth!

Is it unusual for the fur to not be listed on the label?

It's certainly possible but I would guess unlikely, I don't think the previous owner tailored or adjusted any of his other attire.
 
Back
Top